Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South Africa: reliance on trade marks in company name objections
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
A further reason to register trade marks is that they can be relied upon in company name objections.
The Companies Act of 2008 provides for the procedure in which a party can object to the registration of a company name which offends against the provisions of section 11 and the company can be directed to amend its name.
A company name objection can be filed inter alia, if the name –
- is the same as the name of another company;
- is the same as a registered trade mark belonging to a person other than the company, or a mark in respect of which an application has been filed for registration as a trade mark or a well-known trade mark; or
- confusingly similar to a name, trade mark, mark, word or expression.
The objection takes the form of an affidavit filed by the objector in which the basis of the objection is set out in some detail.
As an objector can rely upon trade mark applications and registrations in these objections, it is a further reason to secure trade mark protection.
Werksmans was successful in a recent company name objection on behalf of Capitec Bank against the registration of CAPITEC LIFE by a third party. The objection was based on the name of the company but reliance was also heavily placed on the registered trade marks in Capitec’s name.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
E-waste versus Sustainability: A battle between people, big tech and responsible recycling
A study conducted by the United Nations University in 2019 estimated that approximately 53.6 million metric tonnes of electrical and [...]
The danger of cutting and pasting provisions in your settlement agreements!
On 21 February 2021, the Labour Appeal Court in Wheelwright v CP de Leeuw Johannesburg (Pty) Ltd (2023) 44 [...]
Enhancing Innovation, Technologically
Continuing Werksmans' multi-disciplinary approach in providing our clients with innovative approaches that go beyond the law into wider, business [...]
The proper interpretation of conflicting provisions in the Income Tax Act
and Luke Magerman, Candidate Attorney A recent tax court judgment added valuable jurisprudence to the often-litigated issue of the interpretation [...]
What is the relevance of s 52 of the MPRDA on retrenchments in terms of section 189 and 189A in the mining industry?
In National Union of Mineworkers v Anglo American Platinum Ltd & others (Amplats), on 15 January 2013, Amplats had [...]
Mining terminology: the difference between “accepted”, “granted” “executed” and “registered”
Four of the most common words that one hears in conjunction with mining rights, prospecting rights are "accepted", "granted", [...]
