Legal updates and opinions
News / News
South African musician Daniel Baron vs David Guetta
A South African artist, Daniel Baron has accused David Guetta of copying his 2016 song, “Children of the Sun”. As far as can be seen from media reports a letter of demand has been sent to the various parties representing Guetta and it is unknown as to what the response has been or whether any response has been received by Baron.
In his letter of demand, Baron has also requested to be credited as a co-writer. You can listen to the two portions of the songs which was included in a Jacaranda FM interview with Baron at the following link.
In terms of South African copyright law, the melody of a song will be protected as a musical work which is defined as “a work consisting of music, exclusive of any words or action intended to be sung, spoken or performed with the music” which is the work which will be relevant in this matter.
In 2018 the US Appeals Court had ruled that Robin Thicke and Pharrell’s “Blurred Lines” had ripped off Marvin Gaye’s 1977 classic “Got to Give It Up” and ordered that the royalties be split between the parties. That case also concerned the rights in the musical work as opposed to the lyrics.
It will be interesting to see as to how the matter progresses and we will update our newsletter if there are any developments.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
When is an instruction to work overtime unlawful and unenforceable?
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney AMCU obo Mkhonto v CCMA and Others (JR 2266/17) [2023] ZALCJHB (13 February 2023) Insubordination [...]
Conciliations and the importance of maintaining impartiality
and Tasreeq Ferreira, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether comments made by a commissioner in conciliation proceedings could give rise to a [...]
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Does section 11 (1) of the MPRDA apply to an indirect change in control?
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney In the recent decision of Vantage Goldfields SA (Pty) Ltd & Another v Arqomanzi [...]
Is a municipal by-law prohibiting transfer of property without a “SPLUMA Certificate” constitutional and valid?
In an unreported case[1] of the High Court of South Africa, Mpumalanga Division, Middelburg ("Court"), a number of owners [...]
(Insurance) fraud unravels all: The SCA confirms that fraud can lead to the forfeiture of a partly valid and partly fraudulent claim when a policy says so
In Discovery Insure Limited v Masindi the SCA considered whether the entirety of an insurance claim should be forfeited [...]
