Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The hazardous biological agents regulations: COVID-19 in the workplace
Hazardous Biological Agents
by Jacques van Wyk, Director, Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate, and Danelle Plaatjies, Candidate Attorney
The Minister of Employment and Labour (“The Minister“) published the Hazardous Biological Agents (“HBA“) Regulations (“Regulations“) on 16 March 2022 in terms of section 43 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 85 of 1993 (“OHSA“). The Regulations concern all forms of HBA. This would include, amongst others, SARS-CoV-2 (“COVID-19“).
The Regulations are to be read in conjunction with the Code of Practice: Managing Exposure to SARS-COV-2 in the Workplace (“Code“) which became effective upon the termination of the national state of disaster on 4 April 2022. An update on the recently published Code can be accessed here.
Application of the Regulations “HBA”
The Regulations list COVID-19 as a Group 3 HBA. A Group 3 HBA is defined as an HBA that “may cause severe human disease, which presents a serious hazard to exposed persons and which may present a risk of spreading to the community, but for which effective prophylaxis and treatment is available”.
The Regulations apply to every employer or self-employed person at a workplace where exposure to COVID-19 may occur. The Regulations contemplate reasonably practicable steps that can be taken on the part of an employer to control the exposure to an HBA in a workplace. This includes, amongst others:
- Risk assessments for HBAs
- Exposure monitoring of HBAs
- Medical surveillance
- Record Keeping
- The Prevention and control of exposure to HBAs
- Personal protective equipment and facilities
Failure to Comply with the Regulations “HBA”
Any person who contravenes or fails to comply with these obligations will be guilty of an offence, and liable on conviction to a fine or to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 12 months. Duties of persons who might be exposed to HBAs.
Latest News
Proposed draft legislation to replace Practice Note 31 of 1994
An indispensable requirement for the claiming of an income tax deduction is that the taxpayer must be carrying on [...]
Ruling in favour of the Digital Age: Local and foreign courts give a to electronic agreements and signatures
and Karabo Kekana, Candidate Attorney Recently a Canadian court decided that a emoji constituted an electronic signature and resulted in [...]
When is an instruction to work overtime unlawful and unenforceable?
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney AMCU obo Mkhonto v CCMA and Others (JR 2266/17) [2023] ZALCJHB (13 February 2023) Insubordination [...]
Conciliations and the importance of maintaining impartiality
and Tasreeq Ferreira, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether comments made by a commissioner in conciliation proceedings could give rise to a [...]
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Powers of the Information Regulator and how the Department of Justice could have avoided a R5 million fine
There has been great anxiety amongst organisations since the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) came [...]
