Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The need for an AI framework in South Africa
The 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded on 8 October 2024 to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton for their “foundational discoveries” that enable machine learning with artificial neural networks.
The Nobel Committee said, “Although computers cannot think, machines can now mimic functions such as memory and learning. This year’s laureates in physics have helped make this possible”.
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to advance at an unprecedented pace, it brings immense opportunities and significant ethical challenges. From self-driving cars to healthcare diagnostics, AI systems are becoming integral to our daily lives, prompting urgent discussions about the ethical implications of their use. Understanding the intersection of AI and ethics is crucial for ensuring technology serves humanity positively and equitably.
When reporters asked about the potential significance of the technology his research has helped to develop, Geoffrey Hilton said AI will have a “huge influence” on our societies.
“It will be comparable with the industrial revolution. But instead of exceeding people in physical strength, it will exceed people in intellectual ability. We have no experience of what it’s like to have things smarter than us”.
At the same time, he cautioned that “… we also have to worry about a number of possible bad consequences, particularly the threat of these things getting out of control”.
AI holds transformative potential across various sectors. In healthcare, vast amounts of data can be analysed to assist in diagnosing diseases more accurately and efficiently. AI algorithms can detect fraudulent activities by identifying unusual transaction patterns in finance. Furthermore, AI-driven automation can enhance productivity, allowing businesses to streamline operations and reduce costs.
However, with these benefits come profound ethical considerations. The rapid implementation of AI technologies raises questions about accountability, fairness, transparency, and potential harm.
Privacy becomes a critical ethical concern because AI systems rely on large datasets. The collection and analysis of personal data raise questions about consent, surveillance, and the potential misuse of information. Striking a balance between leveraging data for innovation and protecting individual privacy is essential.
Implementing robust data protection regulations and ethical guidelines for data usage can help address these concerns. This calls for organisations to prioritise user privacy by being transparent about data collection practices, obtaining informed consent, and ensuring secure data handling. Nobel laureates in fields like economics and peace have also voiced concerns about the ethical dilemmas posed by AI. They argue that the technology can perpetuate bias and inequality, especially if AI systems are trained on biased data. For example, the risks of AI in decision-making processes—such as hiring, lending, or law enforcement—can lead to unfair treatment of marginalised groups.
As AI technologies proliferate across various sectors, a comprehensive AI framework is essential for responsible development and deployment. The question might be, why is an AI framework seen as a solution to the ethical dilemma? AI frameworks help define ethical guidelines for AI development and use. These standards can address issues such as ensuring AI systems are designed to minimise biases and provide equitable outcomes for all users. Also, an AI framework can clarify how AI algorithms function and make decisions, enabling users to understand the processes behind AI outcomes.
Given AI’s global nature, not only is a local AI framework necessary but an international framework is also called for to align policies and standards across borders to prevent regulatory fragmentation that could stifle innovation or lead to unethical practices. It cannot be argued that global cooperation is needed to address global issues, such as climate change, public health, and security, leveraging AI for positive outcomes.
Establishing a comprehensive AI framework is essential for navigating the complexities of AI technology. By addressing ethical standards, accountability, privacy, safety, public trust, innovation, and international cooperation, such a framework can ensure that AI is developed and deployed responsibly, ultimately benefiting society. As AI evolves, proactive measures will be crucial in shaping a future where technology enhances human well-being while safeguarding fundamental values.
The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) in South Africa and the University of the Western Cape are developing an AI framework to promote the responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence technologies nationwide. By focusing on ethical guidelines, capacity building, and collaborative research, the framework seeks to harness AI’s potential to drive sustainable development and improve the quality of life for all South Africans. As AI evolves, the framework will guide the integration of AI into society while addressing ethical and social implications, specifically from a privacy perspective.
Latest News
Who was worse: The Attorney or the Legal Practice Council?
Roll of attorneys In a matter recently heard before the Western Cape High Court, erstwhile attorney Gerrit Smit Van Wyk [...]
Shareholders stuck between a rock and a hard place
Companies Act 71 of 2008 Brief overview of Section 163 Introduction There are instances where the Companies Act 71 of [...]
Who appoints the substitute BRP? A look into the meaning of Section 139(3) of the Companies Act
Section 139(3) of the Companies Act Who has the power to appoint a business rescue practitioner's replacement, in circumstances where [...]
The metaverse and data privacy: Will regulation keep up?
What is the metaverse? On 28 October 2021, Facebook Inc.'s chief executive officer Mark Zuckerberg announced the rebranding of his [...]
The PAIA and POPIA dichotomy: What information are you requesting?
Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2 of 2000 We have received numerous queries from clients seeking advice on attending [...]
Security for costs – A White Elephant? A Chimera? Pie in the sky? …On any basis a Herculean task
Security for costs In the recent case of McHugh N.O. & Others v Wright [5641/2021) [2021] ZAWCHC 205 (19 October [...]
