Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
Electronic signatures: recent developments
by Pierre Burger, Director What is an electronic signature, and when will it be valid in place of a handwritten [...]
What is consultation?
Mining companies required to consult with communities Mining is one of the major contributors to the national economy. The issue [...]
Shareholders beware – Section 424 and piercing the corporate veil!
by Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Insolvency, Business Rescue & Restructuring Practice; Nastascha Harduth, Director; and Siyabonga Galela, Candidate [...]
Business rescue – not for the fainthearted
Business rescue proceedings Business rescue proceedings almost invariably take place under less than ideal circumstances. To begin with, all candidates [...]
Proposed Amendments to the Equality Act
Equality Act or PEPUDA In March 2021, the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development ("DOJ") invited interested parties to comment [...]
The Constitutional Court rules on tax allowances for retail loyalty programmes
The Constitutional Court rules on tax allowances It is rare to see tax disputes end up in the Constitutional Court [...]
