Legal updates and opinions
News / News
What are you worth? “if you’re not paying for a product, then you are a product.”
In the digital world, this happens to be true. But it is not only companies that have realised the value that lies in personal data and have monetised it; personal data is just as valuable for cyber criminals.
Data privacy legislation allows for data subjects to sue for civil damages arising out of data privacy violations. But what is claimed?
Personal data carries immense value for various reasons. At its core, personal data is a resource. Access to information creates a competitive advantage and enables the holder of it to understand the playing field, and strategically position itself to lead the competitive landscape. How personal data is used and valued depends primarily on the ambitions of the holder thereof.
For companies, data is an opportunity to better understand the needs, desires and concerns of their customer. Companies aim to commercialize personal data in order to generate higher revenue or create cost savings. In analyzing an existing data set, new business opportunities, services, or products can be identified. Data mining, pattern recognition, or machine learning algorithms assist in getting to the answer. One thing is for sure and that is that data commercialization involves leveraging data to create new value for a business.
On the other hand, cyber criminals steal personal data for a variety of reasons—blackmail, identity theft, extortion—but the most common is to sell that information to anyone willing to pay.
Recently, Vodacom Tanzania PLC (“Vodacom“) has been confronted with the allegation that they shared personal data with an artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, without the complainant’s consent.
Mr. Sayida Masanje (“Mr. M“) has asked the court to grant him relief by ordering Vodacom to pay him damages of SH10 billion for the “substantial loss of privacy” caused by Vodacom’s alleged failure to protect his personal data. [1]
Mr. M argues that –
- during February and March 2023, he discovered his personal data on ChatGPT;
- Vodacom purposely facilitated and allowed third-party unauthorised access to his personal data and proprietary network information; and
- the data shared on ChatGPT includes incoming and outgoing calls, IMEI, IMSI, his SIM identity, his location and other personal identifiable information. [2]
But what is the real worth of personal data? Like any market, the value of personal data is based on supply and demand. We know that male data comes at a higher premium that female data. This is just because there are more females than males in the world. The dark web is where cyber criminals go to sell personal data. As of May 2021, you can buy access to a hacked Facebook account on the dark web for $65 (approximately R1,251)!
On the other hand, because health records often reflect a far more complete collection of personal data of an individual, this being personal identifying and sensitive information, health care records have proven to be of particular value for cyber criminals.
The matter against Vodacom is still pending before the Tanzanian High Court and is scheduled to be heard on 13 September 2023.[3] It remains to be seen whether the Tanzanian High Court will find in favour of Mr. M and if so, what value the court will place on the personal information of Mr M.
We await the outcome!
Footnotes:
[1] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
[2] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
[3] See “Vodacom Tanzania faces Sh10 billion suit over data privacy” accessed on 27 July 2023.
Latest News
Out with the Old: South Africa’s Proposed Overhaul of Exchange Controls and the Inclusion of Crypto Assets
by Janice Geel, Associate and Azraa Sidat, Candidate Attorney, reviewed by Natalie Scott, Director and Head of Sustainability On 17 [...]
Do not call me I’ll call you …… South Africa’s 2026 CPA Amendment Regulations: operationalising the national opt‑out regime for direct marketing and shifting day‑to‑day anti‑spam responsibility to the National Consumer Commission
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory The Consumer Protection Act Amendment Regulations, 2026 deliver the long‑awaited operational framework [...]
Business Rescue Applications Under Scrutiny: business rescue orders are not there for the taking!
by Eric Levenstein, Director and Head Insolvency & Business Rescue and Amy Mackechnie, Senior Associate This article considers the recent decision in [...]
The AI Arms Race and what it means for Competition Law: A new era or new focus
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory We are not in the habit of writing breathless technology briefings. That [...]
The AI Governance Stack and South Africa’s Draft National AI Policy: An Operational Gap in Search of a Framework
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory Author's Note I am presently reading Noah M Kenney's Governing Intelligence: Law, [...]
Speak now or forever hold your peace. The draft AI policy has been published and parties have 60 days to comment
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Regulatory On 10 April 2026, South Africa's Department of Communications and Digital Technologies [...]
