Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC)
ISSUE
Whether the contracts of employment of temporary employment service (“TES”) employees will transfer to the client of the TES in terms of section 198A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 if the employees have been utilised by the client for a period in excess of three months.
COURT’S DECISION
In the case of National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC), the employees were placed by the TES to work for the TES’s client. The employees lodged a dispute in terms of section 198D seeking an order that they had been transferred to the client by virtue of section 198A and should now be regarded as permanent employees of the client. The respondents contended that if the employees were to be granted the order, they would be worse off as they would have to start afresh on new employment contracts with the client, and would thus lose their years of service with the TES. The Commissioner relied on Assign Services (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and others [2015] 11 BLLR 1160 (LC) (“Assign Services”), and held that for the purposes of all labour legislation, save for the LRA, the TES remained the employer of placed employees. In Assign Services the court had to decide whether the deeming provision (section 198A) meant that there was a dual employment relationship between the TES and the client. The court found that the deeming provision does not create a substitution of parties, but rather that the client is a concurrent employer with the TES after the 3 month period of employment. In conclusion the court held that there was no basis in law to grant the applicants the order, and the dispute was accordingly dismissed.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS CASE
This case serves to reiterate the principle of Assign Services, namely that only for the purposes of the LRA will an employee be deemed an employee of both the TES and the client. For all other labour related legislation the employee will remain the employee of the TES.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Labour & Employment sector.
Latest News
COVID-19 and online precautions for brand owners
by Donvay Wegierski, Director As the world heeds the call to stay at home and flatten the curve our online [...]
Specifications and bad faith – The CJEU Skykick ruling
by Donvay Wegierski, Director As trade marks are classified in classes according to the relevant goods and/or services, trade mark [...]
Discovery vs Liberty – When is use of a trade mark an infringement?
by Janine Hollesen, Director Various Discovery companies took Liberty Group Limited ("Liberty") to court over Liberty's use of Discovery's VITALITY [...]
Update to COVID-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (TERS) benefits
By Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; Jacques van Wyk, Director, Bradley Workman-Davies, Director; and Thabisa Yantolo , Candidate Attorney On [...]
COVID-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) benefit calculation
By Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; Jacques van Wyk, Director, Bradley Workman-Davies, Director; and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney Introduction The [...]
Unprecedented times should serve as a reminder: The importance of privacy
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of the Data Privacy practice There was of course no way of knowing whether [...]
