Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Contracts of temporary employment services employees
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC)
ISSUE
Whether the contracts of employment of temporary employment service (“TES”) employees will transfer to the client of the TES in terms of section 198A of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 if the employees have been utilised by the client for a period in excess of three months.
COURT’S DECISION
In the case of National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa obo Nkala and others v Durpo Workforce Solutions [2016] 3 BALR 229 (MEIBC), the employees were placed by the TES to work for the TES’s client. The employees lodged a dispute in terms of section 198D seeking an order that they had been transferred to the client by virtue of section 198A and should now be regarded as permanent employees of the client. The respondents contended that if the employees were to be granted the order, they would be worse off as they would have to start afresh on new employment contracts with the client, and would thus lose their years of service with the TES. The Commissioner relied on Assign Services (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and others [2015] 11 BLLR 1160 (LC) (“Assign Services”), and held that for the purposes of all labour legislation, save for the LRA, the TES remained the employer of placed employees. In Assign Services the court had to decide whether the deeming provision (section 198A) meant that there was a dual employment relationship between the TES and the client. The court found that the deeming provision does not create a substitution of parties, but rather that the client is a concurrent employer with the TES after the 3 month period of employment. In conclusion the court held that there was no basis in law to grant the applicants the order, and the dispute was accordingly dismissed.
IMPORTANCE OF THIS CASE
This case serves to reiterate the principle of Assign Services, namely that only for the purposes of the LRA will an employee be deemed an employee of both the TES and the client. For all other labour related legislation the employee will remain the employee of the TES.
Click on the link if you’ like to more information on Werksmans expertise in the Labour & Employment sector.
Latest News
Professional hunting courses may continue but charter fishing is prohibited – finding a rational balance
Updates on The Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries COVID-19 Directions for Fisheries, Forestry and Biodiversity Sector by Justin Truter, [...]
Non-payment of salaries leads to business rescue
by Bradley Workman-Davies, DirectorThe South Gauteng High court has recently handed down a judgment in which it placed two high [...]
Occupational Health and Safety Directive
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney On 4 June 2020 the [...]
Update: Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) benefit payment to foreign national workers
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden; Senior Associate; and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney On 1 June 2020 the [...]
Turbulence in the Business Rescue of SAA – a new hurdle on the retrenchment track?
By Sandile July, Director and Lisa Appelgryn, Senior Associate On 08 May 2020, the Labour Court handed down what could be considered [...]
Accommodating employees in the workplace
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate and Thabisa Yantolo, Candidate Attorney Under the current COVID-19 regulations, [...]
