Legal updates and opinions
News / News
European Union: Adidas Ruling
By Donvay Wegierski, Director
The General court of the European Union recently upheld a 2016 ruling by the EU regulator thereby cancelling Adidas EU trade mark registration comprising three stripes depicted as:
This trade mark was filed in 2014 and the registration thereof challenged by Belgian company, Shoe Branding Europe. The General court ruled that this trade mark lacked distinctive character and is instead an ordinary figurative mark. The court found that the evidence adduced did not sufficiently show that the consumer, on seeing this three stripe mark applied to clothing, footwear and headgear in the EU would associate the mark with Adidas.
This judgement demonstrates the firm stance adopted by the EU when assessing distinctiveness. Since a trade mark grants the proprietor exclusivity to a mark in relation to the goods and services for which it is registered – in this instance clothing, footwear and headgear in class 25 – the distinctiveness requirement is absolute. The manner in which the trade mark was registered requires particular consideration being three black vertical stripes. Although the court did not find in favour of Adidas in this instance, the ruling may have no effect on the broad scope of protection that Adidas already has on its well-known three stripes registered in various forms in Europe and elsewhere.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
The Supreme Court of Appeal steps in to protect the rights of dual-citizens
Many South Africans were unaware that, until 13 June 2023, if they acquired citizenship in another country (other than [...]
When a séance to raise the dead is permissible… SCA makes finding on nature of discretion exercised when setting aside a winding-up order
An order setting aside a winding up order is akin to raising the dead - especially if the winding-up [...]
National Health Insurance Bill and the possible implications for private healthcare
A second iteration of the National Health Insurance Bill [B11B-2019] has been published. This follows a public commentary period [...]
South African Chapter in The Banking Regulation Law Review | 14th Edition
The 2023 edition of the South African Chapter in The Banking Regulation Law Review | 14th Edition guide is out! [...]
The legal and ethical processing of healthcare information
The overall objective of the Protection of Personal Information Act No. 4 of 2013 ("POPI Act") is to promote [...]
Is the refusal of a provisional sequestration order appealable?
On 14 April 2023, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") delivered judgment in the matter of Liberty Group Limited [...]