Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Gucci is well-known in singapore
By: Donvay Wegiersk, Director
A mark is considered well-known if a larger portion of the public can immediately recognise the mark with the goods and services to which it relates.
In finding that the GUCCI mark is well-known in Singapore, the Singapore trade mark office held that all that needs to be shown is a real or serious probability of damage to the well-known mark’s advertising quality or symbolic function without the need of survey evidence. As survey evidence can be laborious and extremely expensive this approach is likely to be welcomed by owners of luxury and other well-known brands that may be regarded as well-known.
This view would be welcomed by South African trade mark practitioners in light of the expensive and time consuming task in conducting surveys which are usually subject to scrutiny by the opposing party which could be struck out by the courts if not conducted properly.
Latest News
What exactly are the duties and responsibilities of the mining right holder in the retrenchment process in the mining industry?
In Association of Mineworkers & Construction Union v Buffalo Coal Dundee (pty) Ltd & another ("Buffalo Coal"), the Labour [...]
Section 11 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act
In terms of section 11(1) of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002 ("MPRDA") - "A prospecting [...]
The unrealised transformative potential of preferent community mining rights
and Siphamandla Dhlamini, Candidate Attorney The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act No. 28 of 2002 ("MPRDA") was enacted with [...]
Private companies and the new transparency provisions of the Companies Act
by Julian van Niekerk, Director and Cari Cole-Morgan, Director The Companies Act No 71 of 2008 ("Act") was amended on [...]
Generative AI: It’s magic but fraught with legal risks
and Hlonelwa Lutuli, Candidate Attorney The use and beneficial application of generative AI in the workplace is increasing at an [...]
The correct approach to Section 138(5)(a) of the LRA: rescission or re-enrolment?
On 27 May 2023, as a direct response to Labour Appeal Court's judgement of Mohube v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and [...]
