Legal updates and opinions
News / News
JSE efforts to reduce red tape in Section 9 of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing Requirements: Part 2
Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing
On 5 March 2021, the Issuer Regulation Division of the JSE issued a Market Notice on a JSE Consultation Paper titled “Cutting Red Tape Aimed at Effective and Appropriate Regulation: Request for Comments“. The call for comments closed on 9 April 2021, however, due to the vast interest received from stakeholders, the JSE allowed extensions on request from the public. Please see our initial points which we discussed previously.
Taking into account the comments received from market participants and stakeholders, the JSE has proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements, which will now be subject to further public consultation processes pursuant to the provisions of the JSE Listings Requirements and the Financial Markets Act No 19 of 2012.
Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements
In respect of Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements, the proposed amendments include –
- increasing the existing 10% limitation to 30% when categorising a transaction which falls within the ordinary course of business of an issuer, measured against the market capitalisation of such an issuer at the time;
- increasing the factors to be considered by the JSE when assessing whether a transaction is in the ordinary course of business;
- a new provision excluding any transactions with directors and/or their associates from the ordinary course of business exemption; and
- a new provision in terms of which transactions classified as ordinary course of business be announced through SENS immediately after the terms have been agreed and where the categorisation is equal to 5% or more. The announcement must deal with the salient details of the ordinary course of business transaction (excluding pricing information as it may be commercially sensitive) and the corporate approvals obtained by the issuer to conclude the ordinary course of business transaction. The announcement must also include “an opinion from the independent members of the board of directors of the issuer that the transaction is in fact in the ordinary course of business and that the transaction was concluded on an arm’s length basis“. Without getting into a detailed exposition of this requirement, what this essentially means is that independent directors must be able to disclose pertinent insights and observations on the transaction in making such an opinion.
The JSE has invited comments to be sent directly to Alwyn Fouchee at AlwynF@jse.co.za on the proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements by no later than 13 September 2021.
Read part of one of the JSE efforts to reduce red tape in Section 9 of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Listing Requirements.
By Elliott Wood, Director and Bafana Ntuli, Director
Latest News
New directions, regulations and a Labour Court judgment bring clarity to the mining industry
by Chris Stevens, Director and Head of the Mining, Environmental & Resources practice; Kathleen Louw, Director; Bronwyn Parker, Senior Associate; [...]
As little as possible infringement? Is this the case when thinking about the right to privacy in South Africa?
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of the Data Privacy practice A year back there would have been a massive [...]
Some more exemptions from Competition Law during the pandemic
Competition Law during the pandemic We have previously reported on the various block exemptions issued by the Minister of Trade, [...]
The impact of COVID-19 on the use of common areas
by Fátima Rodrigues, Director and Head of the Property Law & Real Estate practice (Johannesburg) and Yatheen Ramnath, Candidate Attorney [...]
Cancellations and postponements of dividends
by Kevin Trudgeon, Director; Brian Price, Director; and Raquel Goncalves, Candidate Attorney The COVID-19 outbreak, the subsequent lockdown and other [...]
A jack of all trades or jacking the trades of others: A case of having your fingers burnt in too many pies
National Union of Metal Workers Of South Africa V Lufil Packaging (Isithebe) (A Division Of Bidvest Paperplus (Pty) Limited) (Unreported) [...]
