Legal updates and opinions
Author
News / News
Parental, adoption and commissioning parental leave
By Jacques van Wyk, Director; Michiel Heyns, Senior Associate and Chelsea Roux, Candidate Attorney
The provisions in the Basic Conditions of Employment Act 75 of 1997 relating to parental, adoption and commissioning parental leave came into effect on 1 January 2020. The difference between these types of leave, its applicability, period of entitlement and commencement date are summarised below –
| Type of leave entitlement | Applicable to whom | Period of entitlement | Commencement date | Provisos |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parental Leave | An employee who is a parent of a child. | 10 consecutive days | The day that the employee’s child is born. | The employer must be informed in writing at least one month in advance, or as soon as reasonably practicable, of the date on which the employee intends to commence parental leave and the date on which he/she intends to return to work. |
| Adoption Leave | An employee who is an adoptive parent of a child under two years. | 10 consecutive weeks | The day that the adoption order is granted or the date the child is placed in the care of a prospective adoptive parent by a competent court, pending the finalisation of an adoption order, whichever date occurs first. |
The employer must be informed in writing at least one month in advance, or as soon as reasonably practicable, of the date on which the employee intends to commence adoption leave and the date on which he/she intends to return to work. If both parents are adoptive parents, one parent may apply for adoption leave and the other for parental leave, provided that the choice is exercised by the two adoptive parents. |
| Commissioning Parental Leave | An employee who is a commissioning parent in a surrogate motherhood agreement (“SMA”). | 10 consecutive weeks | The date that the child is born as a result of an SMA. |
The employer must be informed in writing at least one month in advance, or as soon as reasonably practicable, of the date on which the employee intends to commence commissioning parental leave and the date on which he/she intends to return to work. If both parents are commissioning parents, one parent may apply for commissioning parental leave and the other for parental leave, provided that the choice is exercised by the two commissioning parents. |
| Maternity Leave | An employee who is expecting a child. | Four consecutive months | At any time from four weeks before the expected date of birth (unless otherwise agreed) or on a date from which a medical practitioner or midwife deems it necessary for the health of the employee and/or unborn child. |
The employer must be informed in writing at least four weeks in advance, or as soon as reasonably practicable, of the date on which the employee intends to commence maternity leave and the date on which she intends to return to work. No employee may work for six weeks after the birth of her child, unless a medical practitioner certifies her fit to do so. |
| Maternity Leave | An employee who miscarries or has a stillborn child. | Six weeks | An employee who has a miscarriage during the third trimester of pregnancy or bears a stillborn child is entitled to maternity leave for six weeks after the miscarriage or stillbirth, whether or not the employee had commenced maternity leave at the time of the miscarriage or stillbirth. |
Latest News
The Gauteng School Placements Crisis (2026) — Why Children Are Still Waiting and What the Law Says
By Naledi Motsiri - Director and Nothando Nyoni - Associate As the 2026 school year begins, many parents in Gauteng [...]
The Introduction of a Dedicated Insolvency Court in Pretoria
by Eric Levenstein - Director and Head of Insolvency & Business Rescue and Amy Mackechnie - Senior Associate Following the [...]
Regulatory Snapshot: Financial Services and AML
by Hilah Laskov, Director In this article, we lay out the main regulatory and legal developments in 2025 that [...]
The Need to Plead Properly – Patel vs South African Securitisation Programme (RF) LTD & Others (790/2024) [2025] SASCA 186
by Jennifer Smit, Director On 8 December 2025, the SCA handed down a decision in the above matter which [...]
The union doth protest too much: NUMSA v BMW and the limits of court intervention in disciplinary proceedings
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director The Labour Court’s judgment in NUMSA on behalf of Members v BMW (SA) (Pty) Ltd [...]
Evaluating the public interest effects of a merger: The Competition Appeal Court charts the course
by Paul Coetser, Director and Head of Competition and Kwanele Diniso, Associate When evaluating a merger, the Competition Act 89 [...]
