Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Red is Louboutin
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
Luxury shoe designer Christian Louboutin received a favourable ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) recognising its claim to the colour red (pantone 18-1663TP) as a trade mark.
Louboutin successfully sued Dutch shoe retailer van Haren for infringing its signature colour red trade mark applied to high heel shoes in 2013. Van Haren, however, retaliated and applied to invalidate Louboutin’s colour red trade mark on the grounds that it comprised exclusively of a shape (being the shape of the sole of a high heeled shoe) and as a result was not valid as an EU trade mark.
The court ruled that the trade mark granted protects the colour as applied to a specific part of the shoe, rather than a shape which demonstrates the contour of the shoe to which the colour red is applied.
This ruling means that Louboutin now has exclusivity in relation to red soles for shoes – very powerful protection indeed.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Opportunities for private equity in business rescue
By Elliott Wood, Director and Bafana Ntuli, Director On 23 February 2021, the first ever virtual Ansarada DealMakers Annual Awards [...]
Dismissal of employees who contravene a rule will be fair if proven that employees were aware of the rule or could be reasonably expected to have been aware of it
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether the employees could [...]
Dismissal of employees who participate in unprotected strikes but comply with employer’s ultimatum may not be dismissed
by Jacques van Wyk, Director; Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate; and Lukrisha Ramadu, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether employers, who issue [...]
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS”) extension: appeal process and update
Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme ("TERS") On 27 March 2021 the Unemployment Insurance Fund (”UIF") issued a letter outlining the appeal [...]
Unique Identifiers: Why the distinction?
by Ahmore Burger-Smidt, Director and Head of Data Privacy Practice and member of Competition Law Practice; and Nyiko Mathebula, Candidate Attorney The [...]
SARS casts its non-compliance net wide
By Nicholas Fairbairn, Associate Reviewed by Doelie Lessing, Director Readers should be alert of their exposure to potential criminal liability [...]

