Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme: tax implications
by Doelie, Lessing, Director and Andre van Heerden, Senior Associate
On 16 April 2020 the Minister of Employment and Labour issued amendments to the directives governing the Covid-19 Temporary Employer / Employee Relief Scheme (“TERS“). These must still be published in the Government Gazette. The directives provide, among others, that in order to speed up payment of Covid-19 benefits to employees, employers are urged to pay employees benefits in advance and then reimburse or set off such amounts against funds received from the Unemployment Insurance Fund (“UIF“).
While there are no express tax regulations/directives or amendments issued on whether employers should be treated as ‘agents’ when collecting payment from the UIF there is a strong basis to argue that this is the case and that the payment of these amounts to the employees should not result in a PAYE liability on the TERS benefits. PAYE must, therefore, not be deducted from the TERS benefits. It is also arguable that employees should be exempt from paying tax on the benefits received, as the tax legislation provides for a general exemption from tax of benefits or allowances payable in terms of the Unemployment Insurance Act – provided that the TERS benefits are legally payable in terms of that Act (which appears to be the intention). It is advisable, when affecting electronic payments to the employees’ bank accounts, that the amounts clearly be recorded as ‘UIF TERS benefits.’ This clearly distinguish the payments from any remuneration payments ordinarily received.
Should you require any formal advice regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact us.
Latest News
When can losses on shareholders’ loans be claimed as a tax deduction
by Ernest Mazansky, Head of Tax Practice Introduction It is an inevitable consequence when operating in a distress economy, such [...]
Constitutional Court weakens a key defence for respondents in historical competition cases
by Pieter Steyn, Director The recent decision by the Constitutional Court in the case involving the Competition Commission and Pickfords [...]
South African Airways in Business Rescue – No retrenchments until the business rescue plan requires it
by Bradley Workman-Davies, Director and Neo Sewela, Candidate Attorney On 9 July 2020, the Labour Appeal Court ("Labour Appeal Court") [...]
Collection costs under the National Credit Act, 2005
by Tracy-Lee Janse van Rensburg, Director and Juliet Siwela, Candidate Attorney Collection costs In accordance with the judgment handed down [...]
BOOKING.COM and public perception
by Donvay Wegierski, Director The United States Supreme Court of Appeal has held that the US trade mark applications pending [...]
Constitutional Court clarifies when a contract and its enforcement will be invalid for being contrary to public policy
by Pieter Steyn, Director In a recent judgement involving Beadica 231 CC and others and the Oregon Trust, Sale’s Hire [...]
