Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Gauteng school placements crisis (2026) – Why children are still waiting and what the law says
By Naledi Motsiri – Director and Nothando Nyoni – Associate
As the 2026 school year begins, many parents in Gauteng are not celebrating. They are anxious, frustrated, and in some cases, angry, because their children have not yet been placed in schools, especially in Grade 1 and Grade 8. These frustrations are visible on both social and mainstream media, with parents asking why the system cannot accommodate their children.
The parents of affected children report of a variety of issues that led to their children’s non-placement (at either a specific school, or in some instances, any school), such as: applications were submitted late, technical issues prevented the online system from capturing certain applications, children were allocated to schools that are unreasonably far from their home or the parents’ place of work, or their children were placed at a school that the parents never selected. Some parents have stated that they applied timeously but are still waiting for their children to be allocated to a school. Other parents have expressed frustration over their children—who are South African citizens—not being placed at a school in circumstances where foreign and/or undocumented children have been placed at schools. These frustrations have raised difficult questions about fairness, legality, and the State’s obligations.
The Gauteng Department of Education has acknowledged placement delays, attributing them to capacity constraints, rapid population growth, and pressure on schools in densely populated areas. The Department maintains that the majority of learners placed are South African citizens and denies that foreign nationals are prioritised.
In South Africa, the legal position on the right to education is clear. Section 29(1)(a) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 guarantees everyone the right to a basic education. This right is immediate. It is not subject to progressive realisation, and applies to all children in South Africa, regardless of nationality or immigration status. Additionally, the South African Schools Act No. 84 of 1996 places a duty on provincial education departments to ensure that schools have the necessary capacity to accommodate children, while parents are legally obligated to ensure that their children attend school. The law does not allow schools to exclude children based on documentation status.
Courts have reinforced this. In multiple judgments, South African courts have confirmed that undocumented children may not be denied access to basic education. Policies requiring birth certificates or permits as conditions for admission have been struck down as unconstitutional, because they undermine a child’s right to education.
These judgments do not create special privileges for foreign children. They confirm the simple principle that children must not be punished for their parents’ immigration status or for administrative failures such as unregistered births.
The legal position is settled. The reality, however, is more complicated. Schools are under severe pressure. Popular schools reach capacity quickly. Infrastructure has not kept up with population growth and administrative backlogs delay placements. In this environment, perceptions of unfairness are easy to form, especially when parents receive little communication and no clear timelines. Weeks into the school year, frustration is understandable.
The issue of children’s non-placement at schools is not about citizens versus non-citizens. It is about a system under strain, failing the very children it exists to serve. The Constitution guarantees every child the right to a basic education. Parents demand answers and children cannot wait. Blame will not solve this crisis—clear governmental planning, accountable administration, and urgent investment will. The law gives every child a right to learn, but that right is meaningless if the system cannot put them in a classroom. Gauteng cannot afford more delays. Every child deserves a seat, every parent deserves clarity, and the State must deliver. Not next week or next month, but immediately.
Latest News
Caught on the sidelines: The cost of employee sick leave abuse
Danelle Plaatjies - Candidate Attorney and Yendiswa Sithole - Candidate Attorney What is an employer to do when an employee [...]
Court orders un-redacted documents be provided to SARS
Section 46 of the Tax Administration Act, 2011 (TAA) allows SARS to request 'relevant material' in relation to a taxpayer [...]
The Competition Commission’s Revised Final Public Interest Guidelines: A Critical Framework for Merger Analysis
and Chiara Ferri - Candidate Attorney Introduction The South African Competition Commission ("Commission") has published its final revised Public Interest [...]
Constitutional Court considers evictions in the inner-city of Cape Town
On 27 February 2024, the Constitutional Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Charnell Commando and Others v City [...]
Newsflash: The Competition Authority of Kenya clarifies the position on Administrative Remedies and Settlement.
and Lwazi-Lwandile Simelane - Candidate Attorney On 21 March 2024, the Competition Authority of Kenya ("the CAK") announced that it [...]
Large fines show FSCA is focused on enforcement to leave the grey list – a red flag for non-compliant financial services providers as more fines likely
Gone are the days of box-ticking. The FSCA has imposed penalties on financial services providers for non-compliance with FICA The [...]
