Legal updates and opinions
News / News
The Protection from Harassment Act 17 of 2011
The Act provides simple procedures and remedies in addition to those available to employees in terms of other legislation (such as the LRA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, as amended, and Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000, as amended). The Act applies to harassment of both sexual and non-sexual variants.
Non-sexual harassment is conduct which a person knows or ought to know causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person. This includes following, watching or accosting the complainant or a related person, or loitering near the place where the complainant resides or works. Other forms include unreasonably engaging in communication (which may be verbal or electronic such as email) aimed at the complainant or related person.
If the complainant and harasser are in the same workplace then the employer may incur vicarious liability and have to pay damages. If the complainant obtains a protection order then the employer may be obliged to take measures to ensure that the harasser is able to comply with the protection order. A protection order would be a ground for disciplinary action against the harasser if the action impacts on the employment relationship. If, for example, the employer’s email facilities were used to harass the complainant then the SAPS may request an employer to furnish information relating to emails and employees involved in the harassment. Failure to comply would be regarded as an offence on the part of the employer.
It is essential that employers establish mechanisms to prevent harassment (both non-sexual and sexual) in the workplace. This should include drawing up a harassment policy to inform employees of the serious consequences of breaching the Act.
Latest News
Information Regulator grants its first exemptions under POPIA
The Information Regulator (Regulator) recently granted its first exemptions in terms of section 37(1) of the Protection of Personal Information Act [...]
Pre-owned purchases and the Consumer Protection Act
and Sabine Letellier, Candidate Attorney Purchasing a pre-owned vehicle may deprive a consumer of that new car smell, but it [...]
Proving claims in an insolvent estate – basic principles reaffirmed
In the recent case of Firstrand Bank Limited v the Master of the High Court and others handed down on [...]
Should Post-Commencement Financiers have a vote on Business Rescue Plans?
Reviewed by, Dr Eric Levenstein, Director and Head of Business Rescue & Insolvency A critical look at Wescoal Mining (Pty) [...]
The painted homes of the Ndebele People
To conclude our series on #Heritage Matters, we look at another example of the Traditional Cultural Expressions found in South [...]
Taking stock of collective misconduct
and Nombulelo Bashe, Candidate Attorney The retail sector is often burdened with the issue of stock losses or shrinkage. Employers [...]