Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Red is Louboutin
By Janine Hollesen and Donvay Wegierski, Directors
Luxury shoe designer Christian Louboutin received a favourable ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) recognising its claim to the colour red (pantone 18-1663TP) as a trade mark.
Louboutin successfully sued Dutch shoe retailer van Haren for infringing its signature colour red trade mark applied to high heel shoes in 2013. Van Haren, however, retaliated and applied to invalidate Louboutin’s colour red trade mark on the grounds that it comprised exclusively of a shape (being the shape of the sole of a high heeled shoe) and as a result was not valid as an EU trade mark.
The court ruled that the trade mark granted protects the colour as applied to a specific part of the shoe, rather than a shape which demonstrates the contour of the shoe to which the colour red is applied.
This ruling means that Louboutin now has exclusivity in relation to red soles for shoes – very powerful protection indeed.
If you would like to learn more about Intellectual Property please visit our practice area page.
Latest News
Celebrating International Data Privacy Day: “12 years of POPIA – what next?”
by Tebogo Sibidla, Director On 28 January 2026, the global community celebrated International Data Privacy Day. This year, its commemoration [...]
Advertising Regulatory Board ups the ante on responsible gambling advertising
by Wendy Rosenberg Director and Head of Digital Media & Electronic Communications and Nothando Madondo, Associate While gambling advertising is [...]
Excessive delay in disciplinary proceedings could render the dismissal unfair
Lethoba and Rand Water (2025) 46 ILJ 2771 (CCMA) by Andre van Heerden - Director and Mikayla Ehrenreich - Candidate Attorney [...]
What’s in a name – Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham
by Donvay Wegierski, Director What's in a name - Trade marks and Brooklyn Beckham Brooklyn Beckham, son to British born [...]
Not Every Employee Is a Whistleblower (And Not Every Disciplinary Hearing Is Up for Debate)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Court’s judgment in Modika v Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa and another [...]
Deadlines Are Not Suggestions (And Finality Still Matters)
by Bradley Workman-Davies - Director The Labour Appeal Court’s decision in NUMSA obo Members v Macsteel Service Centres South Africa [...]

