Legal updates and opinions
News / News
Topic – Part 3: The Cutting Red Tape Project
Proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements
On 5 March 2021, the Issuer Regulation Division of the JSE issued a Market Notice on a JSE Consultation Paper titled “Cutting Red Tape Aimed at Effective and Appropriate Regulation: Request for Comments“. There was a vast interest received from stakeholders and the JSE allowed for extensions on input thereon on request from the public.
On 11 February 2022, the proposed amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements were issued in the Government Gazette (No. 45903) by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) for public comment and for all interested parties to lodge any objections.
On 29 April 2022, the FSCA gave notice under the Financial Markets Act of 2012 that the amendments to the JSE Listings Requirements have been approved and came into operation on 1 June 2022.
Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements
In respect of Section 9 of the JSE Listings Requirements, which was the focus of our articles in part 1 and part 2, the amendments (in summary) that have been approved under Section 9 include –
- increasing the existing 10% limitation to 30% when categorising a transaction that falls within the ordinary course of business of an issuer, measured against the market capitalisation of such an issuer at the time. As a result, transactions that fall within the ordinary course of business will require shareholder approval if categorised above the now increased threshold;
- the factors to be considered by the JSE when assessing whether a transaction is in the ordinary course of business have been expanded. These now include considering the size of the transaction measured against similar transactions which have been concluded, whether the transaction contributes to the issuer’s existing revenue stream, whether the transaction contributes to costs that relate directly to such revenue and whether the transaction constitutes the ordinary course of business for both the issuer and the other transacting party;
- transactions with a director and/or any associate of a director will not be classified by the JSE as an ordinary course of business for an issuer, and
- transactions classified as an ordinary course of business must be announced through SENS immediately after the terms have been agreed and where the categorisation is equal to 5% or more. The announcement must deal with the salient details of the ordinary course of business transaction (excluding pricing information as it may be commercially sensitive) and the governance processes that were followed by the board of directors of the issuer to approve and conclude the transaction. The JSE will not require the preparation of a fairness opinion, where related parties are involved (excluding the parties as contemplated in paragraph 3 above).
The JSE is aware of the need for it to be cognisant of an issuer’s activities in the ordinary course of business while at the same time ensuring a fair and transparent market. It is their belief that these amendments will be welcomed by issuers seeking operational flexibility when conducting business in the ordinary course, and a step in making the Listings Requirements more fit for business purposes.
Latest News
Conciliations and the importance of maintaining impartiality
and Tasreeq Ferreira, Candidate Attorney Issue Whether comments made by a commissioner in conciliation proceedings could give rise to a [...]
When reinstatement is not permissible
and Kelly Sease, Candidate Attorney In terms of section 193(1) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (as amended) [...]
Does section 11 (1) of the MPRDA apply to an indirect change in control?
and Mmatshepo Papo - Candidate Attorney In the recent decision of Vantage Goldfields SA (Pty) Ltd & Another v Arqomanzi [...]
Is a municipal by-law prohibiting transfer of property without a “SPLUMA Certificate” constitutional and valid?
In an unreported case[1] of the High Court of South Africa, Mpumalanga Division, Middelburg ("Court"), a number of owners [...]
(Insurance) fraud unravels all: The SCA confirms that fraud can lead to the forfeiture of a partly valid and partly fraudulent claim when a policy says so
In Discovery Insure Limited v Masindi the SCA considered whether the entirety of an insurance claim should be forfeited [...]
When do arbitration awards prescribe?
When does an arbitration award prescribe? Does an award even attract its own period of prescription? The short answer [...]